Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14435 (KAR)

SATISH N.@ SATHISH N v. STATE BY BANASWADI P S

CRL.P/13952/2025 · 2026-04-09

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19983 CRL.P No. 13952 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13952 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SATISH N.,@ SATHISH N., S/O LATE C.NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.113, 2ND G CROSS BALAJI ROAD ABBAYAREDDY LAYOUT, VTC, OMBR, BANASWADI POST, BENGALURU – 560 043. …PETITIONER (BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY BANASWADI P.S., REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU – 560 002. 2. KISHAN S.NAIK SUB REGISTRAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OFFICE NO.740/2 BBMP NO.25, 9TH B MAIN, HRBR LAYOUT, 1ST BLOCK KALYAN NAGAR, BANASWADI Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19983 CRL.P No. 13952 of 2025 BENGALURU – 560 043. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R-1 AND R-2) THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED IN CRIME NO.390/2022 REGISTERED BY BANASWADI POLICE STATION WHICH IS REGISTERED IN CC NO.56220/2023 PENDING BEFORE 11TH ADDL.CJM, MAYOHALL AT BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 420, 468, 471 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 82 AND 83 OF REGISTRATION ACT BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Petitioner – accused No.2 is before the Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.56220/2023, pending before the XI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayohall, Bengaluru, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471 r/w. 34 of the IPC and Sections 82 and 83 of the Registration Act. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19983 CRL.P No. 13952 of 2025 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would now restrict his petition to a direction to the concerned Court for expeditious disposal of the petition. 3. In the light of the said submission, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition, with a direction to the concerned Court to conclude the proceedings, within an outer limit of six months, from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, if not earlier. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 46