Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14433 (KAR)

MR. RAJEEV. S. N. v. SMT. SHARADA

RPFC/269/2022 · 2026-04-15

K Manmadha Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20480 RPFC No. 269 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO R.P.F.C NO.269 OF 2022 BETWEEN: MR. RAJEEV. S. N. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O NARAYAN, R/AT NEAR VEGETABLE MARKET, BEHIND RAMAIAH HOSPITAL, MATHIKERE, YASHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU - 560 054. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHARADI S SHETTY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SHARADA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, W/O RAJEEVA S. N., D/O S.R.MANJAPPA, 2. MASTER DHANUSH AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS, S/O RAJEEVA S. N. BOTH NO.1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT MANJUNATHASWAMY NILAYA, 2ND STAGE, DAYANANDA PRINTERS BACKSIDE, VINOBANAGARA, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 204. …RESPONDENTS (VIDE ORDER DATED 18.07.2025, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS HELD SUFFICIENT) Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20480 RPFC No. 269 of 2022 (R2 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY R1) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., PRAYING TO ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.08.2022 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.50/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SHIVAMOGGA AND ETC THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Service of notice to the respondent is held sufficient vide order dated 18.07.2025. 2. This Court vide order dated 29.11.2022 has granted interim stay as under:- “ORDER ON I.A.NO.1/2022 The case of the petitioner is that respondent No.1 is his wife and admittedly, she has inherited certain rights in the property belonging to her father and there is a rental income of around Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) from the said property and she has share in it. Based on the aforementioned submission, there shall be stay of the execution of the impugned order dated 22.08.2022 passed by the Court of Principal Judge, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20480 RPFC No. 269 of 2022 Family Court, Shivamogga in Crl.Misc.No.50/2019, subject to the petitioner paying the maintenance amount awarded in favour of respondent No.2 in full and 50% of the amount awarded in favour of respondent No.1, till the next date of hearing. Accordingly, I.A.No.1/2022 is disposed of.” 3. Thereafter, the stay granted by this Court is also not extended. Further on 24.03.2026, the petitioner is directed to file the proof for compliance of order dated 29.11.2022, failing which, the interim order stands vacated. It is observed that, petitioner has not filed any proof for payment details with regard to compliance of interim order dated 29.11.2022. 4. Further, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has sent legal notice to the petitioner and it has returned with an endorsement ‘unclaimed’. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to file memo for retirement and sought time. 5. It appears that though legal notice is sent to the petitioner, same is returned as ‘unclaimed’. In view of the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20480 RPFC No. 269 of 2022 same, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in taking steps with regard to compliance of the interim order dated 29.11.2022. In view of the same, nothing survives in the petition. Accordingly, the RPFC is hereby dismissed for non-compliance of the interim order. SD/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE MH/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69