YOGENDRA SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/16356/2026 · 2026-10-05
Vinod Diwakar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14432 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14432 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16356 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.
1. The present writ petition has been instituted seeking quashing of the order dated 28.08.2026, whereby the petitioner has been placed under suspension.
2. This Court is of the view that an order of suspension does not constitute a punishment or penalty imposed upon an employee. Suspension is ordinarily an interim measure adopted in the course of administrative or disciplinary proceedings, intended, inter alia, to facilitate a fair and unhindered inquiry, and does not determine the guilt or otherwise of the person concerned.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedies as may be available to him in law against any subsequent order or action taken in the disciplinary proceedings. October 6, 2026 Shafique Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shive Datta Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manvendra Singh (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Yogendra Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad