Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14429 (AP)

T MANGAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/721/2026 · 2026-02-15

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010008172026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 721/2026 Between: 1. T MANGAMMA, W/O. LATE T. CHINNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-30A, ANNICHERUVU A.A.W, KUPPAM BADUR POST, MITTA KANDRIGA, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238 2. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517501 3. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517501 4. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMACHANDRA PURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 533288 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517501 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517501 7. T KALYAN, S/O. T. JAGGAIAH, R/O. KUPPAM BADUR POST, MITTA KANDRIGA RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, 2 TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517561 8. RAMA MOHAN, S/O. LATE B. KRISHNAIAH, R/O. KUPPAM BADUR POST, MITTA KANDRIGA RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517561 9. A KARIVARDAN, S/O. A. CHINNAIAH, R/O. KUPPAM BADUR POST, MITTA KANDRIGA, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517561 10. B PALANI, /O. LATE MUDDAIAH, R/O. KUPPAM BADUR POST, MITTA KANDRIGA, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517561 11. P JEEVA, S/O. P. NADISHK, R/O. KUPPAM BADUR POST, MITTA KANDRIGA, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517561 12. V MOHAN, S/O. LATE CHINNAIAH, R/O. KUPPAM BADUR POST, MITTA KANDRIGA, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517561 13. M CHUKKAIAH, W/O. LATE M. RAJA REDDY, R/O. KUPPAM BADUR POST, MITTA KANDRIGA, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517561 14. A KARAIAH, S/O. CHINNA GANGAIAH, R/O. KUPPAM BADUR POST, MITTA KANDRIGA, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517561 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS the declaring action of the respondents in interfering with my peaceful possession and enjoyment over the lands in Sy.No.294-1 to an extent of 1.27 cents and Sy.No.294-7 to an extent of 1.00 cents, of Kuppambadur Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupati District without notice and without due process of law and threatening to dispossess the petitioner herein from the said lands as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and 3 violation of Principal of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner respect of lands in Sy.No.294-1 to an extent of 1.27 cents and Sy.No.294-7 to an extent of 1.00 cents, of Kuppambadur Village Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupati District peaceful possession and enjoyment over the their lands and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents, particularly Respondent Nos. 4 to 14, and their men, agents, supporters or anybody acting on their behalf, not to interfere with or disturb the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the lands situated in Sy.No.294-1 to an extent of 1.27 cents and Sy.No.294-7 to an extent of 1.00 cents, of Kuppambadur Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupati District, and further direct the police authorities not to visit the subject lands or assist any private persons in relation thereto, except in accordance with due process of law and under the written orders of a competent authority or court, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P B REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 4 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. In spite of service of notice, none appears for the respondent Nos.7 to 14. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the lands in Sy.No.294-1 to an extent of Ac.1.27 cents and Sy.No.294-7 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents of Kuppambadur Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupati District without notice and without due process of law and threatening to dispossess the petitioner herein from the said lands. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 17.01.2026 submits that the revenue authorities are not interfering with respect to the subject land in Sy.No.294/1 to an extent of Ac.1.27 cents and Sy.No.294/7 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents of Kuppam Baduru Village of Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupati District. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, recording the said instructions of the 4th respondent dated 17.01.2026 no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The written instructions shall be made as part of the court record. 5 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 16.02.2026 NNN