Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14422 (JHR)

SHARIF ANSARI @ SHRIF ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4538/2026 · 2026-05-26

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15481 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4538 of 2026 --- Sharif Ansari @ Shrif Ansari … … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party(s) --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : A.P.P. --- 2/26.05.2026 Heard Mr. Rahul Ranjan learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 43 of 2026. The petitioner and several accused persons were apprehended by the police and mobiles and SIMs were recovered from their possession. They were suspected to be involved in cyber crime. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no victim has come forward to lodge any complaint. It is further being submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 23.03.2026. Learned counsel adds that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent relating to cyber crime. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Regard being had to the above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum-Cyber Crime, Special Court at Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 43 of 2026 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner and he shall remain physically present before the trial court on each and every date till the conclusion of trial, unless prevented by sufficient cause. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) 26th May, 2026. Simran/-