NAYAB HUSSAIN ALIAS TENIS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1725/2026 · 2026-03-12
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14419 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14419 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6546
1 | P a g e
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1725 of 2026
Nayab Hussain @ Tenis, aged about 24 years, S/o. Md. Khalil, R/o. Cross Road No. 12 Zakir Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Azadnagar (Mango), Town- Jamshedpur, Dist.- East Singhbhum.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Adv. For the State
: Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, APP
Order No.02/Dated- 12.03.2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP.
2. The petitioner has been made an accused in connection with Mango P.S. Case No. 250 of 2025, registered for offences punishable under Section 109(1), 308(5) & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, which is pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has been falsely implicated in this case without any rhyme and reasons. It is further submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and there is no direct and specific allegation against this petitioner of assaulting by firearms rather one co-accused Waseem has fired upon the informant causing him injuries on his stomach. It is also alleged in the F.I.R. that other co-accused persons fled away from the place of occurrence. It is also submitted that petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2025. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the
2026:JHHC:6546
2 | P a g e
trial of the case and abides by all terms and conditions which may be imposed. Hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail.
4. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that petitioner has played no role in the offence, I find substance in the contentions raised on behalf of petitioner. Therefore, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection Mango P.S. Case No. 250 of 2025 with condition that petitioner shall appear physically on each and every date during the trial of case till its conclusion unless his physical appearance is dispensed with for sufficient cause to the satisfaction of the learned trial court and with further condition that petitioner shall not indulge in tampering with the prosecution evidence or influence the witnesses or gain over them.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
12.03.2026 Rahul Uploaded on 13.03.2026