Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14418 (MAD)

Rohith v. The Tahsildar

WP/10879/2026 · 2026-04-02

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 10879 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 10879 of 2026 Rohith ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Tahsildar Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi District ..Respondent(s) Directing the respondent to consider petitioner application dated 30.01.2026, and directing the respondent for transfer of patta with regard to the land in Survey No. 729/ 1, 729/2 at Chinnasalem village, kallakurichi District as per the will executed by petitioner grandfather infavour of petitioner on 27.12.2008 vide document No 43 of 2008 on the file of the sub Registrar at Chinnasalem, Kallakurichi District wtihin the time frame fixed by this Honble Court For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Gunasekar For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt.Advocate Order This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondent to pass final orders on the petitioner’s online application dated 30.01.2026 seeking for transfer of patta in the name of the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10879 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2.The petitioner claims that he is the owner of the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition. He has filed documents along with this writ petition to establish his ownership. The petitioner has applied for transfer of patta in his name with the respondent through his online application dated 30.01.2026. Since the same has not been considered, this writ petition has been filed. 3.Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the petitioner’s online application, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners, if any and any other third party whom the respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s online application. 6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10879 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 petitioner’s online application dated 30.01.2026 seeking for transfer of patta in his name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners if any and also any other third party whom the respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 02-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VGA To The Tahsildar Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10879 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA WP No. 10879 of 2026 02-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis