Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14415 (BOM)

THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER v. HARIDAS S/O TANBAJI HANUWANTE

CAW/2555/2026 · 2026-10-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18 wp 6057-2010.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6057 OF 2010 The Municipal Council, Through Its Chief Officer VERSUS Haridas S/o Tanbaji Hanuwante - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Ms M.I. Dhatrak, Advocate for petitioner Shri P.S. Tiwari, Advocate for respondent Ms Deepali V. Sapkal, AGP for respondent/State CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 05.10.2026 1. In view of the order of this Court dated 22.09.2026, the petitioner has filed an additional affidavit on record along with the order issued by the Director of Municipal Administration dated 18.12.2012, thereby rejecting the proposal of respondents-employees of their regularization in services. 2. In view of this, it would be necessary that the Director of Municipal Administration be a necessary party in the present proceeding. Accordingly, petitioner is directed to implead the Director of Municipal Administration as a necessary party in the present petition. The amendment be carried out within a period of one week. 18 wp 6057-2010.odt 2 3. The learned AGP waives for Director of Municipal Administration. 4. The learned AGP shall file the affidavit within a period of two weeks. 5. The petitioner is directed to supply the copy of petition to learned AGP. 6. List this matter after two weeks. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 2553 OF 2026 1. By this application, the applicant is seeking the condonation of delay of 4628 days in setting aside the abatement as respondent expired. As it is reported that the respondent is expired on 29.08.2012, for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. 2. The delay of 4628 days in filing the application for setting aside the abatement is allowed. 3. The application stands disposed of. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 2555 OF 2026 1. By this application, the applicant is seeking setting aside of abatement caused due to the death of the respondent. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. 2. The abatement is set aside and permitted the petitioner to bring the legal heirs of respondent on record. 18 wp 6057-2010.odt 3 3. Shri P.S. Tiwari, learned Counsel waives notice for the proposed legal heirs in the matter. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 2554 OF 2026 1. By this application, the petitioner is seeking to bring on record the legal heirs of respondent. The petitioner on oath has given the details of the legal heirs of respondent. In view of the averment on affidavit, the application is allowed. 2. The petitioner is permitted to bring on record the legal heirs as stated in the application. 3. The application stands disposed of. (PRAVIN S. PATIL J.) R.S. Sahare Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 05/10/2026 19:35:57