HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40324 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The petitioner aggrieved by the fact that the NOIDA were not implementing the allotment letter dated 17.4.2018, has filed the instant writ petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the NOIDA states that in effect the petitioner is aggrieved by the non-execution of the lease deed. 3. Without entering into the merits, we direct that if the petitioner represents before the respondent no.2-the Chief Executive Officer of NOIDA then the representation shall be considered in accordance with law and a specific order shall be passed, with regard to the lease which the petitioner intends to get executed. Needles to mention that the decision would be taken within a period of one month from the date of filing of the representation, if there is no other legal impediment. 4. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 6, 2026 GS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Rana Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Dharamdatt .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM SONI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad