Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14404 (ALL)

SATYAPAL AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/13899/2025 · 2026-10-07

Ajay Kumar Ii, Rajeev Misra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13899 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J. 1. Heard Mr. Arpit Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Om Prakash Verma, the learned counsel for petitioners and the learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents -1, 2 and 3. 2. Perused the record. 3. Petitioners Satyapal and two others have approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition, challenging the impugned FIR dated 03.11.2023, lodged by respondent-3 and registered as Case Crime No. 0298 of 2023, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster Act, Police Station Nawabganj, District Farrukhabad. 4. On the matter being taken up, the learned counsel for petitioners fairly submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer upon completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned case crime number in terms of Chapter XIII BNSS, has submitted police report/final report as contemplated under Section 193 (3) BNSS. 5. In view of above, present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 6. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. October 8, 2026 Monika Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Maurya, Om Prakash Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Satyapal And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MONIKA KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad