NEKKALAPUDI NAGESWARA RAO v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/157/2026 · 2026-01-20
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14401 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14401 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010007802026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 157/2026 Between:
NEKKALAPUDI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATA RAJU, AGED 51 YEARS, CULTIVATION,
DNO 2-131, CHERUVU STREET, SINGARAJUPALEM (V) AVAPADU POST, NALLAGERLLA (M) EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, AMARAVATHI.
2. BOPPANA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O GOPALAM, AGED 49 YEARS. CULTIVATION, R.NO 1-90/2, ACHHANNAPALEM (V), NALLGERLLA (M), EAST GODAVARI DIST - 534 111
3. MADDIPATI DILIP, S/O KASI VISWANADHAM. AGED 37 YEARS, BUSIENSS, DNO 2-120-3, GOPALAPURAM (V), UNGUTURU (M), ELURU DIST- 534 425
4. BOPPANA PADMAVATI, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGED 48 YEARS, HOUSE-WIFE, RNO 1-90/2, ACHHANNAPALEM (V), NALLGERLLA (M), EAST GODAVARI DIST - 534 111
5. MANDALAPU SATYANARYANA, S/O SESHAYYA, AGED 73 YEARS.
CULTIVATION, DNO 2-100, GOPALAPURAM (V), UNGUTURU (M), ELURU DIST- 534 425
6. MANDALAPU SUBBA LAXMI, W/O SATYANARYANA, AGED 69 YEARS. CULTIVATION, DNO 2-100,
GOPALAPURAM (V), UNGUTURU (M), ELURU DIST- 534 425
7. DEYYALA YESU BABU, S/O KRISHNA, AGED 29 YEARS, DNO 3-19, GOPALAPURAM (V), UNGUTURU (M) ELURU DIST- 534 425
8. DEYYALA SHANTI RAJU, S/O KRISHNA, AGED 28 YEARS, DNO 3- 19, GOPALAPURAM (V), UNGUTURU (M), ELURU DIST- 534 425
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. E S R PRASAD
2
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Criminal Petition under Sections 483(3) of BNSS has been filed by the Petitioner / De facto Complainant for cancellation of anticipatory bail order passed in Crl.M.P.No.170 of 2025, dated 10.12.2025 on the file of the Court of XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District.
2. Heard Sri E.S.R.Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1 / State.
3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner herein is the De facto Complainant, who is seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail which was granted to Respondents / Accused in Crime No.227 of 2025 on the file of Nallajerla Police Station. Learned counsel would further submit that, without giving notice to the De facto Complainant, the Court has granted anticipatory bail to the Accused.
4. Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that, it is not the case that Respondents / Accused failed to comply with the conditions imposed by the Court while granting anticipatory bail.
5. Considering the submissions, as there are no grounds for cancellation of anticipatory bail which was granted to Respondents / Accused in Crl.M.P.No.170 of 2025 in Crime No.227 of 2025 vide order dated 10.12.2025
3
by the learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, this petition is liable to be dismissed.
6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:21.01.2026 Dinesh
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.P.No.157 of 2026
Dt.21.01.2026
Dinesh