Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14397 (GAU)

ASHIM ROY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS

WP(C)/3932/2026 · 2026-09-13

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010154532026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3932/2026 ASHIM ROY SON OF LATE ABINASH ROY, RESIDENT OF MOIRABARI, P.S. - MOIRABARI, DISTRICT- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN -782126 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, ASSAM, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM JURIPAR PANJABARI GUWAHATI37 ASSAM DEVELOPMENT ASSAM JURIPAR PANJABARI GUWAHATI37 ASSAM 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782105 4:THE MORIGAON ZILA PARISHAD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE P.O. AND P.S.- MORIGAON DISRTICT- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105 Page No.# 2/3 5:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MORIGAON ZILA PARISHAD P.O. AND P.S. - MORIGAON DISTRICT- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782105 6:THE MOIRABARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER P.O. AND P.S. - MORIGAON DISRTICT- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782126 7:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER MOIRABARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT P.O. AND P.S. - MORIGAON DISTRICT- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782126 8:SHOHIDUL ISLAM SON OF HAMED ALI MOIRABARI. DISTRICT-MORIGAON ASSAM 782126 9:MD JIADUL ISLAM SON OF HAMED AL RESIDENT OF MOIRABARI P.O. AND P.S.-MOIRABARI DISTRICT MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782126 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P P DUTTA, MS P SARMA,MS. P P DAS Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 14.09.2026 Ms. P. P. Das, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner, on instruction submits that the grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition stands redressed with the issuance of an advertisement for settlement of the market, in question. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, she prays that the present writ petition be closed as having become infructuous. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands closed on being rendered infructuous. Interim orders passed earlier, stand vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant