SUBHASH YADAVRAO NINAVE v. STATE OF MAH., THR., PRINCIPAL SEC.,URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. MUMBAI AND ORS.
WP/7864/2026 · 2026-10-05
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14395 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14395 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 133-WP-7864-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.7864 OF 2026 SUBHASH YADAVRAO NINAVE VS STATE OF MAH., THR., PRINCIPAL SEC.,URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. MUMBAI AND ORS. - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M. P. Ladhe, Advocate for petitioner. Shri P. P. Pendke, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR & RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATED : October 05, 2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. In short, it is his contention that though there is encroachment, the respondent No.4-Authority is not taking any action for removal of the same.
3. Without going into merits and demerits of the case, as the concerned Authority i.e. respondent No.4 has not taken any stand, we direct that present petition be treated as representation made by the petitioner and the same shall be decided by respondent No.4 in accordance with law after granting opportunity of being heard to the affected parties within a period of twelve weeks from production of this order.
4. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajnish R. Vyas, J.) ( Anil S. Kilor, J.) Asmita 2026:BHC-NAG:13222-DB Signed by: Smt. Asmita A. Bhandakkar Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 05/10/2026 19:16:35