Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14392 (GAU)

PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR v. DIBAKAR NATH, IAS AND ANR

Cont.Cas(C)/487/2026 · 2026-09-13

Manish Choudhury

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010195922026 2026:GAU-AS:13558 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/487/2026 PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR W/O LATE PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH, R/O VILL- ALENGMARI, P.O.- LAKHIGANJ, P.S.- BILASIPARA, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783345 2: BIBHUJIT NATH S/O LATE PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH R/O VILL- ALENGMARI P.O.- LAKHIGANJ P.S.- BILASIPARA DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 78334 VERSUS DIBAKAR NATH, IAS AND ANR DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, DHUBRI, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783301 2:SARI LALRUOTKIM LUNGTAU ACS CIRCLE OFFICER BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 78334 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M A ISLAM, MR J I MONDAL Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 14.09.2026 Heard Mr. M.A. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Islam has submitted that since the petitioner has already filed an application seeking delivery of the notified public service, ‘Composite Land Sale Transfer’ on 24.03.2026. As the said service has not been delivered by the Designated Public Servant till date, the petitioner will first exhaust the remedy of statutory appeals, as provided by the provisions of the Assam Right to Public Service Act, 2012, as amended. In that view of the matter, the petitioner wants to withdraw the contempt petition, at this stage. In view of the submission made by Mr. Islam that the petitioner will prefer remedy of statutory appeal under the Assam Right to Public Service Act, this contempt petition is closed at this stage. JUDGE Comparing Assistant