APHC010005712026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 671/2026 Between: 1. MADDINENI NIRMALAKUMARI,, W/O LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O, D-NO.4-91, MAIN ROAD, PEDDAPURAM VILLAGE, NTR DISTRICT.(ERST WHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT).521181. 2. MADDINENI SOWJANYA,, W/O BOYAPATI KRANTHI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O, FLAT NO 408, BALAJI APARTMENTS, JUJJURU ROAD, KANCHIKACHERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT, (ERST WHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT).521180. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEP A.P.SECRATARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.522237 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R DISTRICT.520002. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VERRULLAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT.521170 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEERULLAPADU POLICE STATION, VERRULLAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL N.T.R DISTRICT.521170 5. THE TAHSILDAR, VERRULLAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, N.T.R DISTRICT.521170. 6. THOOMATI LAVANYA, W/O THOOMATI YAGAMURTHY,AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/O, D-NO.4-91, PEDDAPURAM VILLAGE, VEERULLAPADU MANDAL, N.T.R DISTRICT.521181. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 3 to 5 in calling the petitioner to Police Station frequently without there being any crime registered against the petitioners and interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent No.6 in R.S.No.28/1, 2 for an extent of Ac.3-37 Cents and also with regard to house property Door No.4-91 Peddapuram Village,Veerullapudu Mandal, Krishna District is illegal, arbitrary, and without having jurisdiction and violation of Art 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 to 5 not to interfere with the Civil disputes between the petitioners and the Respondent No. 6 and also not to call the petitioners to Police Station without their being any crime against the petitioners and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VARDHINEEDI SAI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: < ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents 3 to 5 in calling the petitioners to Police Station frequently without there being any crime registered against the petitioners and interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent No.6 in R.S.No.28/1, for an extent of Ac.3-37 Cents and also with regard to house property Door No.4-91 Peddapuram Village,Veerullapudu Mandal, Krishna District is illegal, arbitrary, and without having jurisdiction and violation of Arts. 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere with the Civil disputes between the petitioners and the Respondent No. 6 and also not to call the petitioners to Police Station without their being any crime against the petitioners and to pass ...= None represented for the Petitioners. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State, on instructions would submit that there are civil disputes between the Petitioners and unofficial respondents with regard to the subject properties and that the Mandal Executive Magistrate & Tahsildar, Veerullapadu, by order dated 27.11.2025 in MC No.20 of 2025 prohibited both the parties from entering into the subject lands until further orders and the Village Revenue Officer, Peddapuram Village is appointed as the custodian officer for the said land. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. 4 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. The respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes except due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 08.01.2026 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 671 of 2026 08.01.2026 Mjl /*