- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11609 WP No. 5475 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 5475 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PARVATHAMMA WIFE OF LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT GIDDEN HALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, PIN CODE-562 130. 2. SRI. G.N.NAGARAJU, SON OF LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT GIDDEN HALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, PIN CODE-562 130. 3. SMT. VENKATAMMA, WIFE OF C.RAJANNA, DAUGHTER OF LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.14, 1ST CROSS, NEAR PALEKAMMA TEMPLE, GAJANANA NAGAR, HEGGANAHALLI, VISWANEEDUM POST, BANGALORE-560 091. 4. SRI. PRAKASHA N., SON OF LATE NARAYANAPPA, Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11609 WP No. 5475 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT GIDDENHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, PIN CODE-562 130. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P.M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA, PIN CODE-562 159. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION, RAMANAGARA, PIN CODE-562 159. 4. THE TAHSILDAR RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA, PIN CODE-562 159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.P. YOGANNA, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO CONSIDER THE PETITION ANNEXURE-J WITHIN REASONABLE PERIOD. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11609 WP No. 5475 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 18.02.2026 the following order was passed: “Finally a week’s time is granted for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 25.02.2026 for dismissal.” 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE HB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4