Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14380 (ALL)

DEEPCHAND AND 3 OTHERS v. BALGOVIND AND 4 OTHERS

A227/13987/2026 · 2026-10-05

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13987 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is a plaintiff's petition. Plaintiff filed a suit for declaring the will deed as null and void. In said suit, an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC was moved, which was allowed by the trial court. Against which, a civil revision has been preferred, which has been allowed by the order impugned and the matter has been remitted back to the trial court to decide the application afresh. 2. As the writ petition has been filed against a remand order and the application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC is pending consideration, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of without causing any interference to the order impugned with a direction to the trial court to expedite the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, without being influenced by the finding recorded by the revisional court. 3. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 6, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vineet Kumar Singh (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Deepchand And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Balgovind And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad