Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14378 (AP)

TALURI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/713/2025 · 2026-01-19

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010005392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 713/2025 Between: 1. TALURI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O DHARMA RAO, AGED 50 YRS, R/AT AT D.NO.39-5-38/1, KAMESWARI COMPLEX, MURALI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (POWER AND ENERGY) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED APEPDCL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEEROPERATION, APEPDCL, MURALINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OPERATION, APEPDCL, KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OPERATION, ZONE-II, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION, APEPDCL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 7. SMT V V BALA SIVA KAMESWARI, W/O (LATE) VENKATA RAMANA , AGED MAJOR, D.NO.39-5-33/1, KAMESWARI COMPLEX, MURALINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): NJS,J W.P No.713 of 2025 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVURI LEELA SAI SAMPATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. TALLURI RAVI KUMAR 2. GP FOR ENERGY 3. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) NJS,J W.P No.713 of 2025 3 The Court made the following Order: It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:20.01.2026 Ksj