Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14372 (KAR)

THE COMMISSIONER v. NAVYA P ACHARYA

WA/1031/2024 · 2026-02-09

D K Singh, S Rachaiah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7808-DB WA No. 1031 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO. 1031 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER UDUPI MUNICIPALITY K M MARG, UDUPI 576101 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ABDULLA T I., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. NAVYA P ACHARYA AGED 26 YEARS D/O PARAMESHWARA ACHARYA R/AT D NO 1-92 ACHARYA COMPOUND GUDDE ANGADI POST UDAYAVARA 574118 UDUPI DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR MUNICIPALITY CORPORATION V V TOWER DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560001 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UDUPI CITY MUNICIPALITY UDUPI 576101 Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7808-DB WA No. 1031 of 2024 4. SRI KRISHNA MUTT PARISARA PRATHISHTANA (R) SRI KRISHNA DHAM RAJANGANA UDUPI 576101 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY RATHNA KUMAR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; SRI. M.N.SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R2; SRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.K.ACHARYA, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05/06/2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.9701/2024 ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND TO DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7808-DB WA No. 1031 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal filed by the appellant has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time, for which he has also filed a memo. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Considering the submission that the writ appeal has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time, we dismiss this writ appeal has having become infructuous. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2