Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14372 (CHH)

YASHPRATAP SINGH JUDEV v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/437/2026 · 2026-02-02

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 437 of 2026 Yashpratap Singh Judev S/o Shri Ranvijay Singh Judev Aged About 26 Years R/o House No. 01, Palace Road, Aaram Niwas, Tehsil- Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, State Transport Authority, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 03/02/2026 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking the following relief:- “10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the records pertaining to case of petitioner. 10.2. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and decide the application of petitioner for grant of Permanent Stage Carriage Permit, in accordance with provisions of Motor Vehicles Rule 1994. 10.3. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in favour of petitioner, may also be granted.” Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE 2 2. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an application for grant of a ‘Permanent Stage Carriage’ on the route from Kunkuri to Ranchi via Jashpur, Manjhatoli, Gumla, Sisai and one trip back for the vehicle Bus bearing registration No.CG-14-MP-1111 is pending consideration before the Regional Transport Authority. He would further submit that a direction may be issued to the respondent authorities to decide the pending application dated 22.11.2025, expeditiously. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard. 5. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Mishra, at this juncture, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent to decide the pending application of the petitioner for grant of ‘Permanent Stage Carriage’ preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim