Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14371 (ALL)

RESHAMA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/14915/2026 · 2026-10-05

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14915 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Mr. K. Shahi, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned final result declared in respect of the subject Hindi dated 28.07.2026 (Annexure No. 1) to the extent it adversely affects the petitioner and same may be re-declared after doing appropriate corrections in respect of the question objection which was raised by the petitioner. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to award 4 marks to the petitioner on account of having taken the correct answer in respect of question No. 102 of the master set of the final answer key dated 28.07.2026 issued by the Selection Board. III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to make the selection of petitioner on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher subject Hindi on the basis of attempted question No. 94 of question booklet /corresponding question which is question No. 102 of the impugned master set of final answer key dated 28.07.2026 correctly, in pursuance of the Advertisement No.01/2022 Trained Graduate Teacher, issued by the Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission, Prayagraj. IV. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in to the facts and circumstances of the case. IV. Award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner." 3. The issue in question has already been settled by the Lucknow Bench of this Court by its judgment dated 28.09.2026 passed in Writ-A No.8055 of 2026 (Seema Gupta And 20 Others vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhineet Kumar, Dhara Singh, Kuldeep Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kushmondeya Shahi Reshama Devi .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Secy. Secondary Education Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others). 4. Considering the fact that a decision has already been taken by the respondent authorities with respect to Question No.94 of question booklet/corresponding question which is question No.102 of the impugned master set of final answer key of the Hindi question paper of the T.G.T. Examination (Adv. No.01/2022). The respondent authorities may take a decision and proceed with the declaration of result accordingly. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of, accordingly. October 6, 2026 K.N. WRIA No. 14915 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad