Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1437 (JHR)

JALIL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1234/2026 · 2026-03-10

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6298 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1234 of 2026 ------ Jalil Ansari, S/o Ahsan Ansari @ Ehsan Ansari, R/o Village-Hanhat, P.S. Kairo, P.O. and Dist.-Lohardaga .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Ms. Sonal Pandey, Advocate Mr. Ayush Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, APP ------ Order No.02 / Dated : 10.03.2026. Heard both the sides. This bail application has been filed on behalf of Jalil Ansari who is in custody since 02.08.2025 in connection with Kairo P.S. Case No. 40 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 390 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 115, 126, 109/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Lohardaga, is pressed into motion. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the offence under Section 109 of BNS, 2023 will not be made out, as there was no intention to cause death and the incidence took place at the spur of moment over a land dispute. The assault was not premediated and the spade, which was lying in the place of occurrence, was used in the heat of motion allegedly by this petitioner to inflict blow to the injured. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the injured sustained grievous injury on the vital part of the body. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances and since the incidence took place at the spur of moment, petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Pawan/ Uploaded 11.03.2026