HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16296 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "Issue, a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 25.05.2025 passed by the Respondent No. 5, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jhansi, by which for an amount of Rs.17,46,427/- has been directed to Recovered from the Salary of the petitioner (enclosed as Annexure - 1) to the writ petition." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing appeal against the order impugned. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. October 6, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshika Singh, Navneet Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Rajendra Krishna Awasthi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad