( 2026:HHC:26982 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.674 of 2026 Decided on: 7th July, 2026 Satish Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a communication dated 02.07.2026 and copy of office order dated 06.04.2026 passed by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 171001, which are taken on record. 2. A perusal of the aforementioned order dated 06.04.2026 reveals that the mandate contained in the judgment has been complied with and the petitioner has been allowed higher pay scale after completion of two years regular service, subject to the final outcome of the LPA filed by the State in Mohit Sharma’s case. The DDO concerned has been 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:26982 ) 2 directed to fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrears. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 06.01.2026 passed in CWP No.211 of 2026, titled, Shri Satish Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., has been complied with, the present petition is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the arrears, if not already released be released within a period of eight weeks from today, failing which, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition. 4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 7th July, 2026 Judge (naveen)