Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14364 (BOM)

SACHIN S/O SUKHDEV MESHRAM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., KAPIL NAGAR PS NAGPUR

APPP/3231/2026 · 2026-10-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 15-Cr.APPP-3231-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPP] NO. 3231 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION [B.A.] NO. 542 OF 2026 Sachin S/o Sukhdev Meshram -- VERSUS -- State of Maharashtra __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr. D. Dani, Advocate h/f. Ms. S.A. Jadhao, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.B. Badar, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State. CORAM : M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2026. Heard. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for speaking to the minutes / seeking clarification of the order dated 05/05/2026. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court has granted liberty to the applicant to move before the trial Court after a period of 4 months, in case, the trial is not concluded. Now, in spite of the lapse of 4 months, the trial has not been concluded, therefore, the applicant has approached the trial Court by filing a bail application. However, the learned A.P.P. raised an Piyush Mahajan 2026:BHC-NAG:13169 2 15-Cr.APPP-3231-2026 objection that the said application is not tenable before the Sessions Court, as this Court has not specifically observed that the application was to be filed before the trial Court. Therefore, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that in view of the objection raised by the learned A.P.P., a clarification is needed in respect of the order dated 05/05/2026 passed by this Court in Criminal Application [B.A.] No.542/2026. 4. I have heard the learned A.P.P. also. 5. Upon consideration of the order dated 05/05/2026, it is necessary to clarify that when this Court had granted liberty to the applicant to file a fresh bail application after a period of 4 months, the said liberty was intended to enable the applicant to file a fresh bail application before the trial Court / Sessions Court. Accordingly, a clarification is made. The Criminal Application [APPA] No.3231/2026 is allowed and disposed of in the above terms. [ M.M. NERLIKAR, J ] Piyush Mahajan Signed by: Piyush Ramesh Mahajan Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 05/10/2026 18:28:35