Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14363 (KAR)

SMT. BHAGYAMMA S v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15676/2021 · 2026-03-18

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16064 WP No. 15676 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 15676 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHAGYAMMA.S WIFE OF LATE SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 2. AISHWARYA. S DAUGHTER OF SHIVARAJ AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS.1, 2 ARE RESIDING AT: NO.40/1 KOMALA NILAYA, 2ND FLOOR 2ND CROSS, MOODALAPALYA NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD SHIVANANDANAGARA BANGALORE-560 072. 3. SMT. THEJAVATHI S DAUGHTER OF LATE SIDDAIAH WIFE OF B.RAGHU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.2235, 1ST CROSS GANDHINAGARA, MANDYA KARNATAKA -571 401. 4. SMT. PREMALATHA S DAUGHTER OF LATE SIDDAIAH Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16064 WP No. 15676 of 2021 WIFE OF P.V. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA BANGALORE-560 040. 5. SMT. NIRMALA.S DAUGHTER OF LATE SIDDAIAH WIFE OF BALARAJ AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.18 7TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 040. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PANDURANGA G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. SMT. MANJULA K WIFE OF SUNIL AGED ABOUT NO.36, 4TH CROSS, MALAGALA 8TH BLOCK NAGARBHAVI, 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560072. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16064 WP No. 15676 of 2021 SRI. N. SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION READ WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING TO QUASH FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.105/2021, REGISTERED IN THE CHANDRA LAYOUT POLICE STATION, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498-A, 504, 149, 323 OF IPC ON THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY SMT. MANJULA.K (RESPONDENT NO.2) SO FAR AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS PENDING ON FILE 8TH ADDL. CMM COURT, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE CITY VIZ-ANNEXURES-A AND B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that the parties, namely petitioners and respondent No.2 have settled the dispute and hence, the petition does not survive for consideration and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. 2. The memo is taken on record. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16064 WP No. 15676 of 2021 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA