Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1436 (ALL)

SATISH CHANDRA MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/5305/2026 · 2026-05-07

Prakash Padia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 5305 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Learned Standing Counsel placed Instructions dated 04.05.2026 received under the signatures of Chief Treasury Officer, Ghaziabad/respondent No.2, the same is taken on record. 2. It is argued by learned Standing Counsel that the aforesaid Instructions are not so enough to resolve the controversy involved in the petition and prays to grant some time to seek fresh Instructions. 3.In this view of the matter, three weeks further time is granted to seek fresh Instructions. 4. Put up as fresh on 10.07.2026 before appropriate Bench. May 15, 2026 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ratnesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Satish Chandra Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad