Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14359 (ALL)

RAHUL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/16661/2026 · 2026-10-07

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16661 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. By means of present writ petition, petitioner is seeking transfer because of the medical condition of his wife from the present posting to Aligarh Range. In this regard, petitioner has already moved a representation before respondent No.2 dated 24.01.2026. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that since the petitioner has already approached respondent No. 2, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the representation of petitioner dated 24.01.2026, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably, within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after providing opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the matter on merits of the case. October 8, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Rahul Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad