PIYUSH RAMESH CHAVAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
BA/812/2026 · 2026-10-05
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14352 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14352 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1/2 95-BA-812-2026 (CR).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 812 OF 2026 Piyush Ramesh Chavan …...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. …...Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Abhijeet P. Chabukswar, for Applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 5th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C.
1. This Application is at Serial No.95 on the Daily Cause List. At 10:30 a.m., Mr. Abhijeet P. Chabukswar, learned Advocate for the Applicant mentions the matter and requests that it be taken up out of turn. At his request, this Application is taken up out of turn.
2. Heard Mr. Abhijeet P. Chabukswar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State. Shantanu S. Dhudum SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2026.10.05 17:17:47 +0530
2/2 95-BA-812-2026 (CR).DOC
3. By this Application, the Applicant seeks bail in connection with Crime No. 464 of 2026 registered at Phaltan Rural Police Station, District Satara.
4. Mr. Abhijeet P. Chabukswar, learned Advocate for the Applicant, tenders a photostat copy of the order dated 1st October 2026 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Phaltan, in Crime No. 464 of 2026. The same is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification.
5. Mr. Abhijeet P. Chabukswar, learned Advocate for the Applicant, by relying on the said order, states that the Applicant has been released on default bail. He, therefore, submits that this Bail Application is rendered infructuous and requests for disposal of the same.
6. Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State, does not oppose the request made by Mr. Abhijit P. Chabukswar, learned Advocate for the Applicant.
7. In view of the statement made by Mr. Abhijit P. Chabukswar, learned Advocate for the Applicant, this Bail Application No.812 of 2026 is dismissed as infructuous.
( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum