Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14349 (ALL)

GIRJA SHANKAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/40501/2026 · 2026-10-07

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40501 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State. 2. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of non- bailable warrant dated 25.10.2013 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh in Case No.888 of 2011, arising out of Case Crime No.317 of 2010, under sections 279, 337, 338, 427 IPC, P.S. Charra, District- Aligarh. 3. On perusal of entire record appended along with instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned non-bailable warrant can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Thereafter, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to NBW order dated 25.10.2013 to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, applicant is hereby directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned NBW order dated 25.10.2013 within three weeks from today. Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law. 7. Lastly, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has already Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Girja Shankar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) been granted bail and as such learned court concerned may not compel him to prefer fresh bond and surety. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. October 8, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 40501 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad