IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 CRWP-3942-2026 DATE OF DECISION: 08.04.2026 COL VIKAS PANDEY … Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Anand Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Janesh Kumar Khera, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Chirag Suri, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavana Datta, Advocate for the respondents-UOI. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that certain issues raised before the Armed Forces Tribunal, have not been decided while passing the impugned judgment and therefore, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a review before the Armed Force Tribunal raising the said grievance. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) 08.04.2026 JUDGE sapna adhikari Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KUMARI SAPNA 2026.04.09 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document