1 2026:CGHC:289 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6665 of 2025 1 - Parmeshwar Prasad S/o Shri Johan Lal Aged About 50 Years R/o Municipal Council Bhatgaon, Tahsil Bhatgaon, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Revenue, Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Bhatgaon, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - Sanvara Samaj Through Vice President Ramkumar Son Of Ghassu, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sanvara Niwas, Bhatgaon, Tahsil Bhatgaon, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Dhurandhar, Advocate. For State : Mr. Keshav Gupta, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 05/01 /2026 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of direction to respondent No. 2 to take decision on the application dated 04.12.2025 submitted by the petitioner for cancellation of allotment order dated 14.08.2023 whereby the government land has been allotted to respondent No. 5. 2. The petitioner who is owner of the land bearing Khasra No. 3063/9, 3063/13, 3063/5 admeasuring 0.084 hectare situated adjacent to the government land bearing Khasra No. 3062, 30656 situated at Village Bhatgaon, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh. Respondent No. 2 allotted ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2026.01.05 18:29:27 +0530 2 0.008 hectare i.e. 870 sq.ft. land in favour of respondent No. 5 vide order dated 14.08.2023 but they have constructed excessive to the land allotted to respondent No. 5, and he has already protected by learned Tahsildar by issuing removal of the excessive construction but the said order has not been complied with. 3. From contention made by learned counsel for the petitioner, it is quite vivid that that the petitioner has raised violation of easementary right, therefore, the instant writ petition at this juncture is not maintainable. 4. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take recourse available to him under the Civil Procedure Code. 5. In view of the above, the instant petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun