Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14347 (BOM)

KALPANA ATUL PAWAR v. ATUL SUBHASH PAWAR

FCA/90/2025 · 2026-10-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14-FCA-90-2025 (C).doc IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 90 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11194 OF 2025 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 90 OF 2025 Kalpana Atul Pawar ] Appellant versus Atul Subhash Pawar ] Respondent ..... Mr. S. R. Fakir, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Sachin M. Bhavar, Advocate for Respondent. ..... CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 5th OCTOBER 2026. P. C. : 1. Both the learned counsel have tendered the consent terms dated 5 October 2026. They have informed us that parties have settled their dispute amicably and residing together since last three months. They submit that the said consent terms have been signed by their respective clients, who are present in the Court. They identify the signatures of their respective clients on the Consent the terms. Consent terms dated 5 October 2026 are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. Submissions made in the said consent terms are taken as undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings are also accepted. 2. For ease of reference, scanned copy of the consent terms is reproduced hereinbelow; Shailaja 1 SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Digitally signed by SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2026.10.05 18:20:50 +0530 14-FCA-90-2025 (C).doc Shailaja 2 14-FCA-90-2025 (C).doc Shailaja 3 14-FCA-90-2025 (C).doc 3. Family Court Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms dated 5 October 2026. In sequel, all Interim Applications stand disposed of. 4. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.] [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.] Shailaja 4