Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14344 (ALL)

ANJU SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/11115/2026 · 2026-10-05

Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar J Conf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11115 of 2026 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE SANDEEP JAIN, J. Sri Shyam Surat Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mehul Khare, learned counsel for respondent no. 2, and Sri Manu Saxena, learned counsel for respondent no. 3, Nagar Palika Parishad, Modi Nagar, Ghaziabad, are present. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 submits that the petitioner was operating a handloom unit in a residential locality, which was causing noise pollution. In this regard, the Regional Office of the U.P. Pollution Control Board, Ghaziabad conducted an inquiry and found that the sound level generated by the said unit was exceeding the prescribed limit of 55 decibels applicable to a residential area. Consequently, respondent no. 3 was directed to take necessary steps for closure and shifting of the petitioner's handloom unit vide order dated 18.03.2026. It is further submitted that, in compliance with the aforesaid order passed by the U.P. Pollution Control Board, the petitioner has already stopped operating the handloom unit with effect from 22.04.2026. Learned counsel, therefore, submits that, since the operation of the handloom unit has already been stopped, no relief survives for adjudication in the present petition. In view of the aforesaid submission, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to challenge the order dated 18.03.2026 passed by the U.P. Pollution Control Board, Ghaziabad. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Surat Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Jagannath Maurya, Manu Saxena Anju Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 has no objection to the withdrawal of the present petition with the aforesaid liberty. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 18.03.2026 passed by the U.P. Pollution Control Board, Ghaziabad, before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. October 6, 2026 Himanshu CRLP No. 11115 of 2026 2 (Sandeep Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad