Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14331 (ALL)

RAKESH DUTT AND OTHERS v. STATE AND OTHERS

WRIA/62225/2008 · 2026-10-05

Anish Kumar Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 62225 of 2008 Court No. - 34 (Sl. No. 236.5) HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. List revised. None appears for the petitioners. Sri H.M.B. Sinha, learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 7,8 and 12 is present. Yesterday also none appears for the petitioners. 2. The instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- " a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIRORARI quashing the impugned selection/order dated 26.08.2008 issued by the respondent no. 5 (Additional District Magistrate (Rahat) Prabhari Adhikari (Sangrah) and order dated 02.09.2008 passed by the respondent no. 6 Sub Divisional Magistrate/Appointing Officer) Annexure No. 16 and 16A to the writ petition. b)issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the respondents not to permit the person junior to the petitioners to work in pursuance of the order dated 26.08.2008 and 02.09.2008. c)issue a writ, order or direction of suitable nature commanding the respondents to grant regular appointment to the petitioners as Collection Amin forthwith. d) issue a writ, order or direction of suitable nature commanding the respondents to permit the petitioners to function as regular Collection Amin and to pay regular monthly salary regularly every month to the petitioners. e) issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit and proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjani Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.K.Srivastava, C.S.C., H.M.B.Sinha Rakesh Dutt And Others .....Petitioner(s) State And Others .....Respondent(s) f)Award cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioners. " 3. At the time of filing of the instant petition, petitioner- Rakesh Dutt was aged about 55 years and during the pendency of the instant petition, it appears that the cause of action in the instant petition does not survive any more, thus, none appears on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 6, 2026 n.u. WRIA No. 62225 of 2008 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- NASEEM UDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad