SHIVA HARIT S/O SURESH CHAND, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3455/2026 · 2026-04-02
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1433 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1433 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13847] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3455/2026 Shiva Harit S/o Suresh Chand, R/o Kotdadeep Singh, Police Station Budhadeet, District Kota (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Accused-Petitioner/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Non-Petitioner Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3456/2026 Suresh Valmiki S/o Shri Ramnath, R/o Kotdadeep Singh, PS Budhadeet, District Kota (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Accused-Petitioner/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sharma Mr. Manjeet Saini Mr. Krishan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 02/04/2026
1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 20/2026 registered at Police Station Budhadeet, District Kota Rural for the offence(s) under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 352, 3(5) BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 3(5) BNS.
[2026:RJ-JP:13847] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3455/2026]
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are behind the bars since February, 2026. He also submits that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners has already been filed. He further submits that there is no criminal antecedent against the accused-petitioner Suresh Valmiki and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and submits that there is one another criminal case instituted against accused-petitioner Shiva Harit. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that charge-sheet has already been filed; the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since February, 2026 and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Shiva Harit S/o Suresh Chand and Suresh Valmiki S/o Shri Ramnath are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court
[2026:RJ-JP:13847] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3455/2026] and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /71-72