Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1433 (CHH)

PADUM LAL PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13830/2025 · 2026-01-01

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13830 of 2025 1 - Padum Lal Patel S/o Shri Setram Patel Aged About 50 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School Selar, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Public Instruction, Directorate Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ashwani Shukla, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 02/01/2026 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s):- “10.1. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct to the Respondent No. 4 to consider the case of the petitioner by deciding the pending representations and changing place of posting. 2 10.2 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 & 4 to fallowed the posting guidelines dated 07.02.2022 and 29.03.2023 issued by the Respondents No. 1 & 2. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to dispose of this writ petition as per order passed in WP No. 5190/2025 order dated 24.06.2025. 10.4 Any other relief/reliefs which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file better constituted petition. 3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.02 17:56:12 +0530