Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14323 (AP)

KOTLA VENKATA SUBBAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CC/22/2022 · 2026-01-22

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010006192022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 22/2022 Between: 1. KOTLA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O SUBBA RAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/D.NO. 46/201, NAGARAJUPETA, BESIDE AGRICULTURE OFFICE, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT, AP. 2. KOTLA CHENNAMMA,, W/O KOTLA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 51 YEARS, R/D.NO.46/2O1, NAGARAJUPETA, BESIDE AGRICULTURE OFFICE, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT, AP. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPALITIES, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, AP. 3. SRI LAVANNA, COMMISSIONNER OF MUNICIPAL, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, AP. (NOW WORKING AS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRISAILAM TEMPLE, KUNRNOOL DISTRICT, AP 4. SRI U RANGASWAMI, COMMISSIONNER OF MUNICIPAL, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, AP. (PRESENT) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents no.3 and 4 invoking the provisions of the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willful,wanton and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court order dated 3-82021 in WP No.12800 of 2021, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 03.08.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.12800 of 2021. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 03.08.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.12800 of 2021, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner for initiating separate proceedings for further claim if any. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date : 05.01.2026 RMD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH C.C. No.22 of 2022 Date : 23.01.2026 RMD