Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14322 (CHH)

RAM NATH MISHRA v. SURAJ BAI PANDEY

WPC/240/2026 · 2026-01-19

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:3190 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 240 of 2026 1 - Ram Nath Mishra S/o Bodhan Prasad Mishra Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Sonsari Tehsil Akaltra, Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Aman Mishra S/o Ram Nath Mishra Aged About 26 Years Caste Brahmin, R/o Village Sonsari Tehsil Akaltra, Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - Suraj Bai Pandey D/o Late Hetram Pandey Aged About 70 Years Caste Brahmin R/o Sonsari, Tehsil Akaltra, Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Dulari Bai D/o Late Hetram Pandey Aged About 65 Years Caste Brahmin, R/o Village Sonsari Tehsil Akaltra, Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Naib Tehsildar Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS system) For Petitioners : Ms. Pooja Sinha, Advocate For State/Respondent No.3 : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer. (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 20/01/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate petition/application before the competent authority. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.01.21 10:46:20 +0530 2 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. On due consideration, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to law available to them. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar