- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16593 WP No. 37521 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 37521 OF 2025 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: SRI ABDUL RAHIM S/O K.ABDUL SALAM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT.1270, 1ST STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, MATAKAR LANE, OPP. MASJID E ALI, H.B.R. LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560045 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANSWAMY T. AND NARAYAN BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. BASAVARAJA PATEL G. K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY (SECONDARY) M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001 REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. SAAMAR INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC SCHOOL UNDER THE MANAGEMENT OF JAMIA Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16593 WP No. 37521 of 2025 MUHAMMADIYAH EDUCATION SOCIETY, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT MUMBAI-400008. ALSO AT: JAMIA MUHAMMADIYAH MANSOORA UNDER THE MANAGEMENT OF JAMIA MUHAMMADIYAH EDUCATION SOCIETY, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT MUMBAI-400008. ALSO AT: THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, R.K.HEGDE NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 077, REP. ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MR. KHALID MUSHARRUF, S/O. R.ABDUL JALEEL. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SUKANYA BALIG B., AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. V.B. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO THE R2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER DATED 28.11.2025 VIDE ANNX-P TO TAKE SUITABLE ACTION AGAINST THE R3 INTUITION PROVISIONS UNDER EXISTING LAW OR ANY OTHER LAW PERMITS, WITHOUT FURTHER LOSS OF TIME. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16593 WP No. 37521 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, petitioner has sought for a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 28.11.2025 as to take action against respondent No.3- Institution. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsels appearing for the parties that the prayer in the above writ petition has become infructuous, as action has been taken by respondent No.2 against respondent No.3-Institution. 3. Accordingly, no further orders are required to be made in this writ petition. 4. The writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE AP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53