Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2026:HHC:26687 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 569 of 2026
Decided on: 06.07.2026 ________________________________________________ Karam Singh ....Petitioner Versus
Nipun Jindal & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the judgment under reference has been complied with in its letter and spirit.
2. Since judgment under reference stands duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:26687
3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law.
4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.
( Sushil Kukreja )
6th June, 2026 Judge (raman)