Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1432 (UTT)

KHUSNASEEB v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/314/2026 · 2026-03-17

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1806 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/314/2026 1. Mr. Bilal Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- (i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR dated 19.01.2026 registered as case crime no. 44 of 2026 under Section 3 Section 5 read with Section 11 of Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, PS Kotwali Manglaur District Haridwar. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in Case Crime No. 44 of 2026 under Section 3 Section 5 read with Section 11 of Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, PS Kotwali Manglaur District Haridwar till the pendency of present petition. 4. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to surrender before the court concerned, however, since the “Ramazan” is going on, the protection may be given during this period. 5. The State counsel has no objection. 6. In such view of the matter, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the court concerned on or before 30.04.2026. Till then, the petitioner shall not be arrested provided he cooperate with the investigation. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 17.03.2026 Nahid 2026:UHC:1806