SUNITA RAJU PADALE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
WP/3271/2026 · 2026-10-01
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14318 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14318 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 1 330-WP-3271-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3271 OF 2026 Sunita Raju Padale .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents ….... • None present for Petitioner. • Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 01st OCTOBER, 2026 P.C. :
1. The matter is mentioned by the learned APP. He stated that the detenu is already released. He tendered a report of the sponsoring authority and it is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The Petitioner was released on 22/08/2026.
2. The statement is recorded.
3. Considering this statement, nothing survives in this Petition.
4. The Petition is disposed of.
(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Nesarikar MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date: 2026.10.05 15:01:54 +0530