Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14318 (ALL)

NAIMA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/10319/2025 · 2026-10-05

Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Rajeev Misra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10319 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. Even though the names of Mr. Mazhar Ullah and Mr. Vimlendu Tripath , Advocates are duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioners but neither they nor any one on their behalf is present to press present writ petition. 3. Learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1 and 2 is present. 4. Though the name of Mr. Zafeer Ahmad, Advocate, is also published in the cause list as counsel for first informant, but neither he nor any one on his behalf is present to oppose present writ petition. 5. Petitioners-Naima And 3 Others have approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition challenging the FIR dated 08.04.2025 lodged by first informant-respondent-3, Nazim and registered as Case Crime No. 0162 of 2025, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station- Bilari, District-Moradabad. 6. On the matter being taken up, the learnedA.G.A. for State-respondents 1 and 2 submits that upon completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned case crime number in terms of Chapter XIII BNSS has submitted the charge sheet/police report and upon which cognizance has been taken. Accordingly, petitioner has filed an application against above i.e. application under Section 528 BNSS No. 42075 of 2026 (Smt. Naima Alias Naeem and 3 others Vs. State of U.P. and another). He, therefore, submits that in view of above, this writ petition be dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mazhar Ullah, Vimlendu Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Zafeer Ahmad Naima And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. In view of above, we are of the opinion that by efflux of time the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 8. It is accordingly, dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 9. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 6, 2026 Imtiyaz CRLP No. 10319 of 2025 2 (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad