Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14316 (ALL)

APSAR AHAMAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA528/34600/2026 · 2026-10-07

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34600 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Santosh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajneesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Girish Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri Karunakar Singh, A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special Session Trial No. 281 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No. 200 of 2023, under Sections 376(2(n), 313 of I.P.C., and u/s- 5/6 POCSO, Police Station- Saraimamrej, District- Prayagraj, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 20.09.2023 pending in the Court of Special Judge, POCSO Act, Court No. 2, Allahabad. Learned A.G.A. pointed out that charge has been framed against the applicant. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining a xerox thereof. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 8, 2026 Ishan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Girish Kumar Mishra (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Apsar Ahamad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad