Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010003482026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 443/2026 Between:
1. L ANJINAIAH DEALER, KADIDODDI VILLAGE, S/O.HESEENI, AGED.33 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-112, KADIDODDI VILLAGE, KOSIGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,
AMARAWATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP.
3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR/R D O, ADONI, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, KOSGI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the R-3 in issuing Show Cause notice after 6 years of the allegations, to cancel the
2
authorization of the FP shop of the Petitioner vide proc in Rc.(M).3397/2017, Dt.18-12- 2025, is liable to be set aside as unjust and illegal, contrary to well established principles of law, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of Art 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, violative of the provisions of Civil Supplies Act, and by consequently direct the Respondents herein to allot the stock continuously forthwith, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the respondents herein to allot stock to the F.P. Shop No. 1302028 of Kadidoddi Village of Kosigi Mandal, Kurnool District forthwith, by suspending the Proc. in Rc.(M).3397/2017, Dt.18- 12- 2025, pending Disposal of this W.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
Sri S.M.Subhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 27th January, 2026
RKS