Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14310 (RAJ)

LAKHANTI DEVI v. JAIUPR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

CRES/204/2026 · 2026-09-01

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:35159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 204/2026 In S.B. Civil First Appeal No.1140/2019 CNR: RJHC020302722026 | URN: CRES / 515U / 2026 1. Lakhanti Devi, Aged About 33 Years, W/o Ramkhiladi, 2. Kamla Devi, Aged About 55 Years, W/o Girraj, 3. Vijay, Aged About 12 Years, S/o Late Ramkhiladi, 4. Manish D/o Late Ramkhiladi, Aged About 10 Years, Appellant No. 3 And 4 Minor Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Lakhanti Devi, All Residents Of Village Shrirampura, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa. ----Applicants Versus 1. Jaiupr Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Through Chairman Vidhyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Assistant Engineer, A-1, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hukam Chand Saini For Respondent(s) : Ms. Khushi Jain for Ms. Anuradha HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 01/09/2026 Heard on the application No.907/2026 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay caused in filing the restoration application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the restoration application is hereby condoned. [2026:RJ-JP:35159] (2 of 2) [CRES-204/2026] Heard on restoration application No.204/2026. For the reasons stated therein, the restoration application is allowed with the consent of both the parties and S.B. Civil First Appeal No.1140/2019 is restored to its original number. Office is directed to proceed further. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J 62/GARIMA