Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14305 (AP)

Sayed Basha Sab v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/973/2026 · 2026-01-28

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010002122026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 973/2026 Between: 1. SAYED BASHA SAB,, S/O. LATE KASIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, RESIDING AT YALLAKALLU VILLAGE, V.KOTA POST, AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517 424 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517 001 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. - 517 408 4. THE TAHSILDAR, V.KOTA, MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. - 517 424 5. GAFOOR SAB, S/O. LATE KASIM SAB AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS OCC - AGRICULTURE - 517 424 6. SUBHAN SAB, S/O. LATE KASIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS OCC- AGRICULTURE - 517424 7. ABUSAMA SAB, S/O. LATE KASIM SAB AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS OCC- AGRICULTURE - 517 424 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.973 of 2026 8. AZIMABEE, D/O. LATE KASIM SAB AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS OCC- AGRICULTURE 517 424 ABOVE THE RESPONDENTS NO. 5 TO 8 ARE RESIDING AT YALLAKALLU VILLAGE, V.KOTA POST, AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents No. 4 to 8 in interfering with Petitioner rights over the landin an extant of Ac. 0.62 Cents in Sy.No. 24214D, of Yallakallu village,V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District,belong to Petitioner without assigning any reason whatsoever,without putting Petitioner on notice or following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power, and well established legal principles, apart from being voilative of fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to Petitioner under Article 14,19,21 and 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No. 4 to 8 in interfering with petitioner rights over the landin an extant of Ac. 0.62 Cents in Sy.No. 24214D, of Yallakallu village,V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents No. 4 to 8 in interfering with Petitioner rights over the landin an extant of Ac. 0.62 Cents in Sy.No. 242/4D, of Yallakallu village,V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B.V.DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.973 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, for which he addressed a letter dated 28.01.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial). 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 29.01.2026 PGT