Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14302 (MAD)

R. Gunasekaran v. Tamil Nadu State Commission of Women

WP Crl./853/2026 · 2026-04-17

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 853 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR WP Crl. No. 853 of 2 026 and WPMP.Crl.No.287 & 288 of 2026 R. Gunasekaran S/o. Ramasamy, Plot No.21, 2nd Street, Vasantham Nagar, Kolathur, Chennai - 600 099. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Tamil Nadu State Commission of Women Rep.by its, Chairman, Kalas Mahal,1st Floor, Chepauk,Triplicane, Chennai, Tamilnadu - 600 005. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Dindugal District. 3. V.Sowmiya W/o. R.Rudhra, 3D, Dakshin Ishwaryam Apartments, Vengittapuram, Amman Koil Veedhi, Coimbatore - 641 013. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The writ petition criminal filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st Respondent in Na.Ka.No.684/M.Aa/A3/2026 dated on 05.03.2026 and quash the same and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s): S.Parthasarathy For Respondent(s): Mr.R. VINOTH RAJA Govt.Advocate (CRL. SIDE) for R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 853 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The writ petitioner, challenging the order passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.684/M.Aa/A3/2026 dated 05.03.2026, had filed this writ petition. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the first respondent conducted an enquiry and enquired the third respondent and the petitioner. The allegation by the third respondent is that the marriage between the third respondent and R.Rudra in the year 2018. During the marriage, she has brought 100 sovereign of gold jewels. Thereafter, to help her father-in-law, the third respondent gave her jewels. Thereafter, several requests have been made, jewels not returned. In the meanwhile, on 2021 the jewels were brought for auction, which was informed by her mother-in-law and it has been redeemed but not handed over to the third respondent. Hence, the commission by its order dated 05.03.2026 directed the Superintendent of Police, Dindugal to take appropriate action. 3.The learned counsel further submitted that it is purely a civil dispute between the father-in-law and daughter-in-law, which has been now magnified and projected as though the petitioner had committed offences of misappropriation and cheating. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 853 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4.The learned Govt. Advcoate (Crl.Side) submitted that on a complaint of the third respondent, CSR.No.228 of 2026 was assigned on 15.03.2026 and enquiry is pending. Notice to the petitioner will be served on the petitioner and the petitioner to appear before the Inspector of Police, Oddanchathiram and to give his explanation during the enquiry along with supporting documents, if any. The order passed by the first respondent needs no interference and now the second respondent initiated action, now, enquiry is conducted. 5.With the above direction, the writ petition criminal is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition are closed. 17-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sms To 1. Tamil Nadu State Commission of Women Rep.by its, Chairman, Kalas Mahal, 1st Floor, Chepauk, Triplicane, Chennai, Tamilnadu - 600 005. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Dindugal District. 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 853 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. sms WP Crl. No. 853 of 2 026 and WPMP.Crl.No.287 & 288 of 2026 17-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis