Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14302 (AP)

ADUSUMILLI SRI RAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/688/2026 · 2026-01-21

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010004032026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 688/2026 Between: 1. ADUSUMILLI SRI RAM, S/O. LOKA SATYA RATNA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO. 245, SRINIVASA NAGAR BANK COLONY, ROAD NO. 5, OPPOSITE WATER TANK, PLOT NO. 245, VIJAYAWADA - 520008. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATIONS AND STAMPS, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-521151. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH - 520010 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, PATAMATA SRO, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. - 520010 5. ADUSUMILLI LOKA SATYA RATNA KUMAR, S/O KRISHNA MOHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO. 245, SRINIVASA NAGAR, BANK COLONY, ROAD - 5, OPPOSITE WATER TANK, VIJAYAWADA - 520008. 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.688 of 2026 6. ADUSUMILLI SASI MOHAN, S/O LOKA SATYA RATNA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O PRESTINE ESTATES, HOUSE NO.33, GOPANNAPALLI THANDA, TALLAPUR ROAD, SERILINGAMPALLI-500107, RR DISTRICT, TELANGANA -500019. 7. GORLA BHARGAVI, W/O JAYA PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O VILLA NO.W2, ESMERALD FORTUNE VILLAGE, NEAR CHIREC SCHOOL, BOTANICAL GARDENS ROAD, KONDAPUR, HYDERABAD-500084. 8. ADUSUMILLI PAVAN KUMAR, S/O KRISHNA MOHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 32-2-15, GHULAM MOHADDIN NAGAR, RATNAMBA STREET, MOGHULRAJAPURAM, OPP.STATE BANK OF INDIA, VIJAYAWADA-10. 9. ADUSUMILLI KRISHNA MOHAN, S/O MOHANA RAMDAS, AGED 46 YEARS, RIO HOUSE NO.8-90, ISNAPUR CROSS ROADS, OPP. IBP BUNK, ISNAPUR-502307, PATAN CHERUVU MANDAL, MEDAK DISTRICT, TELANGANA - 502110 10. ADUSUMILLI SAKUNTHA MOHAN, S/O MOHANA RAMDAS, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RIO D. NO. 40-261-15, BRINDAVAN COLONY, SRIRAM NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-10. 11. ADUSUMILLI VENKATA SEETHA MAHALAKSHMI, W/O MOHANA RAMDAS, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 40-261-15, BRINDAVAN COLONY, SRIRAM NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-10. 12. DONAVALLI SAKUNTHALA DEVI, W/O DONAVALLI ANANTH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RIO D. NO. 48-11 /8-5/4A, 5TH FLOOR, OM NAMAHSHIVA STREET, CURRENCY NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA - 520008 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents No 3 and 4 in proposing to register documents relating to the suit schedule property, despite pendency of O.S. No. 107 of 2025 and I.A. No. 696 of 2025, as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents not to receive, entertain, or register any 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.688 of 2026 document relating to alienation, transfer, or creation of third-party rights in respect of the suit schedule property pending disposal of I.A. No. 696 of 2025 in O.S. No. 107 of 2025 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents No 3 and 4 to maintain status quo with regard to nature, possession, and alienation of the suit schedule property pending disposal of I.A. No. 696 of 2025 in O.S. No. 107 of 2025 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.688 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Ms. G. Arthi, the learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 22.01.2026 PGT